I do not believe that a school which depends on one exceptional leader is yet a strong school. It may be successful for a time, but it remains vulnerable. Decisions bottleneck, staff wait for permission, capable people become frustrated and improvement slows whenever the leader is absent. The task of leadership is therefore not to become indispensable. It is to build the confidence and capacity of others.
Distributed leadership is often misunderstood as giving everyone more jobs. That is workload distribution, not leadership development. Leadership involves agency, influence and responsibility for outcomes. People need a meaningful area in which to think, decide, act and learn, with clarity about how their contribution connects to the school’s purpose.
At Rushen, ‘Everyone a Leader, Everyone a Learner’ meant looking beyond job titles. Formal roles mattered, but expertise and initiative existed throughout the school. Teachers led aspects of curriculum and pedagogy. Support staff contributed insight about children and families. Pupils took responsibility and influenced school life. The aim was not to flatten accountability. It was to widen participation in improvement.
Senior leaders set the conditions. They make the direction clear, identify strengths, create opportunities and provide coaching. They also decide where authority can be shared and where responsibility must remain with them. Distributed leadership is not abdication. The headteacher remains accountable for the quality and safety of the school. The difference is that accountability is exercised by growing capability rather than controlling every action.
Good distribution improves decisions because the people closest to the work often see what senior leaders cannot. A teaching assistant may understand why an intervention is failing. A class teacher may identify a curriculum sequence that confuses pupils. A lunchtime supervisor may notice a relationship pattern invisible in lessons. Leadership draws these perspectives into action rather than treating them as informal observations with nowhere to go.
It also strengthens belonging. People are more committed to decisions they have helped shape, particularly when their contribution is genuine. Consultation without influence quickly becomes theatre. Leaders should be honest about what is open for decision, what is constrained and how views will be used.
Shared leadership requires a tolerance for difference. If every delegated decision is corrected until it looks exactly as the headteacher would have done it, colleagues learn that ownership is fictional. Leaders need to distinguish between a different method and an unacceptable outcome. Coaching questions often develop judgement more effectively than instructions.
Pupil leadership deserves the same seriousness. It should be more than badges, assemblies or carrying messages. Children can help evaluate learning environments, improve routines, support peers, contribute to curriculum decisions and lead community action. Agency grows when adults share real responsibility and provide the support needed to exercise it well.
The strongest sign of distributed leadership is not the number of roles on an organisational chart. It is how the school responds to a problem. Do people wait for the headteacher, or do they use shared principles, expertise and judgement to begin solving it? Great schools are full of people who know when they can act, when they should collaborate and when they must escalate.
Leadership across the school makes improvement more intelligent and sustainable. It reduces dependency, develops future leaders and honours the expertise already present. Most importantly, it changes the story from ‘the leader improved the school’ to ‘the school learned how to improve itself.’
This is the fifth in a series on the ingredients of a great school. New instalments are added regularly: you can find the latest on the Articles page. You can also read more about my leadership background on the About page.
← Previous in the series: Trust: The Foundation on Which Professional Growth Depends
Next in the series: Leading Across Cultures: What International Schools Taught Me →